Rules for Scientific Writing

In general, the best writing is simple and direct. Writing that is simple and direct is most easily understood. It also tends to be the most forceful and memorable. Use no more words than necessary and never use a complicated word if a simpler one will do just as well. Many people seem to feel that writing in a complicated way makes one sound serious, scholarly and authoritative. While this type of writing may sound serious, it is no more authoritative than writing that is simple and direct. Certainly, it is more difficult to understand. Often, it sounds pompous and overbearing. If your purpose is to be understood in a way that is both forceful and memorable, adopt a style that is simple and direct.

  • Interest, inform, and persuade the reader
  • Write for your reader and write clearly
  • Eliminate unnecessary redundancy
  • Avoid digressions
  • Don’t over explain and avoid overstatement
  • Avoid unnecessary qualifiers
  • Use consistent tenses
  • Use the precise word
  • Simpler words are preferred over complex words and use concrete words and examples
  • Simpler sentences are preferred over more complicated sentences
  • Use the active voice (except generally in methods)
  • Make sure the subject and verb agree
  • Use affirmative rather than negative constructions
  • Avoid use of the indefinite “this”
  • Use transitions
  • Cite sources as well as findings
  • Proofread your paper carefully; spell check does not catch everything; “there” is spelled correctly but not if you meant “their”

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Scientific writing, Writing

Strategies for editing & proofreading

LEAVE YOURSELF PLENTY OF TIME (for all steps of the writing process, including editing): By making and following a timeline for the paper, you are more likely to have time to finish everything with the proper amount of care and attention. Also, keep in mind that it may be best to lay your paper aside for a day or so before proofreading and editing, as you may be more likely to catch errors or notice structural problems if your writing isn’t so “fresh” in your mind.

GET ACQUAINTED WITH YOUR RESOURCES: You don’t need to memorize every grammar or citation rule that may apply to the genre or discipline in which you’re writing—you can look them up. Take advantage of the resources available to you: dictionaries, thesauruses, handbooks, citation guides, handouts from class, librarians, and writing center consultants.

KNOW YOUR WEAKNESSES: Keep a list of errors you tend to make: it will help you know what to look for when you edit. You can also read the paper once for each error type—if you’re only looking for one thing, you’ll be more likely to notice it.

PRINT A COPY OF YOUR PAPER TO USE WHEN EDITING AND PROOFREADING: It is much harder to catch errors on a screen than on paper.

READ YOUR PAPER OUT LOUD: Often, when we read silently, our eyes skip over small errors, awkward or run-on sentences, and typos. By reading out loud, you force yourself to notice everything from spelling and word choice to the structure of sentences. You can also have someone read your paper aloud and tell you where they are confused.

READ YOUR PAPER BACKWARDS: Another way to force yourself to notice small details is to take things out of context. Try reading your paper backwards, sentence by sentence or paragraph by paragraph, so that you are focusing on the text, not the ideas. This technique is especially helpful for catching sentence fragments.

CHECK THE PUNCTUATION: Look over the paper on a sentence-by-sentence level to see if your punctuation is correct. Are commas in the right places? Are there any run-on sentences? If you aren’t sure about how to use certain kinds of punctuation, look in a manual, explore other quick tips, and/or ask a writing consultant for help.

CHECK EACH IN-TEXT CITATION: For correct formats and verify that the source is in the Works Cited or References list. This is also a good time to double-check the spelling of authors’ names, book or article titles, and so on.

REREAD QUOTATIONS: It is all too easy to mistype when copying words.

GET FEEDBACK FROM OTHER PEOPLE: Because we are such a part of what we write, it can be difficult to step outside our work and view it critically. When you seek outside opinions, you can break free of the isolation and absorption of writing and receive perspectives and insights that you may have otherwise missed. You are no longer left wondering whether you followed the guidelines of the assignment, whether your structure and language are clear, etc. By asking for feedback from other people, you are taking essential measures to improve your writing and to develop as a writer.

DON’T RELY SOLELY ON COMPUTER HELP: Spell-check and grammar-check tools are useful, but they do not constitute or substitute for proofreading. Develop and follow your own editing strategies, and don’t be fooled into thinking that computer tools alone are adequate for the job.

REST, RELAX, REREAD: Leave your paper alone for a day or two. Having some distance from what you’ve written can make your proofreader’s eye more clinical and perceptive. In addition, you may find changes you would like to make after you read your text later.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Editing, Proofreading

The process of writing

Creating a text involves the scrutinizing and summarizing of knowledge, but also includes the actual process of writing. Even among experienced writers, few are able to produce a final version of a text in the first draft. Writers can certainly benefit from experience, but there is a danger that habituation can result in an over-reliance on tired formulae. While writing requires know-how and knowledge of language and genre conventions, the act of writing is also creative cognitive activity.

There are many ways of stimulating the act of writing and getting the process started. One such tried and trusted method is to chart your thoughts on a mind map. With the help of a mind map, you can organize (construct) the knowledge you possess. In this way, you can create for yourself a representation of your own thoughts and the relationships between them before you start to write. Used well, a mind map can clarify the boundary between essential and non-essential knowledge. Mind maps are particularly helpful for writing which is goal-oriented and situated in a specific context, a characteristic of the writing of scientific journal articles. There are several free mind mapping tools available online.

The larger and more complex your research study, the greater the challenge of reporting your reading and communicating new knowledge. In this, we can make a distinction between the reiteration and the reworking of knowledge. The reiteration of knowledge is the reporting of knowledge published by other authors in your own articles, in order, for example, to provide a theoretical frame of reference for your research. The reworking of knowledge is essentially connected to the shaping of new knowledge from your own research. Through references to the literature, scientific text is characterized by intertextuality, which can be described as a discussion between texts. These dialogues stimulate your thinking, help you to develop your stance and formulate your own unique contribution to the discipline.

Scientific articles are limited to a certain length, which means that you are faced with a concrete challenge of meeting this limitation. You have to be able to recognize the essential aspects of a study and publicize these in accordance with the conventions of the discipline and the journal in question. The main focus of scientific text can be considered to be new knowledge (research findings) rather than reiterated knowledge (received knowledge). To separate essential from non-essential knowledge, you may need to be aware of when you are writing for yourself and when you are writing for others. While writing for yourself is informal, even creative, activity, writing for others relies on the communication of knowledge using formal conventions. These two dimensions are a fundamental part of the process of writing scientific articles. You can lessen the anguish of creation by permitting yourself to write for yourself. In the process of writing, the creation and revision of text go hand in hand, in parallel with writing for oneself and writing for others.

An indispensable part of the writing process is the procurement of feedback. Ideally, a draft should be read by several readers so that the feedback includes a variety of perspectives. It is important that you also request positive and supportive feedback. As the feedback is received, the revision continues and lasts until the publication of the text.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Scientific writing, Writing

Cultural differences in scientific writing – The language issue

Some differences have been observed in the writing in English of Finnish and native-speaker writers. One difference has been noted in the use of phrases which help guide the reader through the article and make the text easier to follow. The possibly more frequent use of such phrases in English texts reflects what is referred to as “writer-responsible orientation”, where the writer leads the reader explicitly through the text, as opposed to a “reader-responsible orientation”, where the writer relies on the reader’s ability to make sense of the message. Anglo-American readers tend to expect that writers take responsibility for making their message clear to readers, guiding them to notice what the writer deems to be important and convincing the readers to accept the writer’s claims. These phrases may take the form, for example, of

  • previews of what is to follow later in a text,
  • explanations of what topics the text will not cover,
  • summaries of significant topics that have already been discussed,
  • signals of the writer’s commitment or caution towards a claim
  • explicit instructions about where readers can find illustrations or data presented in tables or figures.

The use of such devices, however, varies from one discipline to another and from one part of a journal article to another.

Another area of difference can be noted in the approach to argumentation. For example, it has been observed that, when reporting the main results of a study, Anglo-American writers have a tendency to begin with the results, followed by supporting explanation.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Scientific writing, Writing

Genre knowledge to enhance persuasion: structure and language choices

The skills of narration and persuasion in the context of research reporting, you need to be aware of the distinctive features of research articles, in general, and of the specific research-reporting conventions of your discipline, in particular. This is known as genre knowledge, which implies a familiarity with the widely accepted characteristics of the content, structure and style of a text from a particular genre.

As a researcher, you can gain credibility by following the genre rules of written communication in your discipline. The basics of such genre knowledge related to research reporting include the following:

  • organising the contents of your article into sections using the IMRaD pattern or its disciplinary variant (N.B. the IMRaD (Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion) structure, while widely accepted as a model, certainly has a variety of modified forms in different fields and disciplines),
  • keeping to the conventional information content and sequence of the individual sections (e.g. the Introduction presents the i) background of the study, ii) references to previous literature, iii) relevance of the study, iv) research question or purpose of the study),
  • discipline-specific use of titles (complete sentences, noun phrases or compound titles),
  • discipline-specific use of references (types of in-text referencing and list of references),
  • the types of illustrative devices (tables, graphs, figures) used, and how these are integrated into the body of the text,
  • the style of language used in research articles
    • formal written language
    • discipline-specific terminology
    • general scientific idiom: appropriate word choices, word forms and combinations [get results ==> obtain results; do a test ==> carry out a test]
    • grammatical choices typical for the type of article you are writing, including use of articles, typical usage of verb tenses in different sections of the article, preference for active or passive voice,
    • use of punctuation, capitals, abbreviations, etc.

The best way of exploring the disciplinary conventions of your field is perhaps to analyse articles in your field, paying particular attention to the above features and to familiarise yourself with the requirements and instructions for publication in target journals.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Editing, Formatting, Journal Selection, Writing

How to get your journal article published?

Why should you consider publication?

  • Do you have contribution to make? i,e the conventional wisdom is mistaken; this is theory extension / filling a gap; this is novel, innovative work. Questions to ask yourself: Who’s going to be interested? How does it build on what we already know? How significant is your message? How sure are you of your findings?
  • It is important for your career
  • Publication is integral to the academic’s role

Tips before submitting

  • High risk submissions: conversion of a big report or monograph or doctorate thesis; straight conference paper, not focused for the journal, not formatted for the journal and it might be published elsewhere in the conference proceedings
  • Low risk submissions: papers written for the journal, i,e it fits with the genre and scope of the journal, engages with the debates, refers to previous work published in the journal and related publications

Which journal should you submit to?

  • Does your research fit the journal’s aims and scope?
  • What type of submission is it? Empirical research, review paper, brief report, thought piece, book review. Does the journal publish these kinds of papers?
  • Does the journal have a good reputation in the field? Are the Editor and Editorial Board high profile?
  • Check the references to see in which journals the research you are citing mainly falls.
  • Is it ISI ranked or ranked highly with other metrics, eg h-index, ABS, ERIH, ERA
  • Does your institution have any restrictions on where you can submit articles?
  • What is the acceptance/rejection rate?

Tips before submitting

  • Read the journal’s aims and scope
  • You may wish to discuss your paper with the journal Editor.
  • Consult with colleagues

What should you do to prepare your manuscript?

  • Read the manuscript submission guidelines.
  • Make every effort to improve the quality of the manuscript before submission.
  • Be as objective as possible about your work.

Manuscript submission guidelines checklist should include the following golden rules:

  • Have you used the right references, eg Harvard, APA, Vancouver, Chicago?
  • Have you stayed within the word limit?
  • Is it single/double blind review? If so, ensure there are no identifying features in your manuscript.
  • Have you confirmed to the conventions of academic writing?
  • Has permission been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the Web)?
  • Have you proofread it before submitting?
  • Have you provided a cover letter? Keep it short and highlight the salient features in the letter.
  • Have you considered including supplemental data? Will it add value to the content?

What happens next?

Depending on the journal, your article will be considered by the Editor/s and/or Associate Editors and 2-4 reviewers, often from the Editorial Board. If it is submitted to an online system, you will receive an acknowledgement and a reference number. Please use this reference number if you need to follow up on your manuscript.

There are four possible outcomes:

Desk reject* – ie, your paper will not be sent out for review.

Conditional accept with major revisions – depending on the level of revisions, it may need to be resubmitted as a new manuscript. This may be due to several factors.

Conditional accept with minor revisions – these papers generally do get accepted, provided the minor revisions are adhered to

Accept without change – this outcome is extremely rare.

*Reasons for a desk reject may include: poorly focused and/or ‘fit’ with journal objectives; obviously speculative paper/another journal’s rejection; inadequate literature base; weak methodology; poor analysis/contribution; not well rounded, ie beginning, middle and end; poor English; not formatted for the journal.

When can or should you contact the Editor?

Again, check the website. It might stipulate how long the review process takes. Some manuscripts may take longer to review, particularly if they are niche areas and it is difficult finding good reviewers. It is reasonable to chase up your paper if you feel it has exceeded the stated guidelines.

Handling revisions

  • Cover issues raised point by point. Don’t rush!
  • Demonstrate what you have done
  • Provide a point by point covering note to each referee and page number citations
  • If you cannot meet all criticisms, point out why
  • Be positive/constructive
  • Note – the process can take 2 -3 iterations

Handling rejections

  • Don’t over-react. The criticisms are there to enhance your paper
  • Carefully read referees’ report and Editor’s letter
  • Try to focus on why? Wrong journal? Fundamentally flawed? Specific problem?
  • Try and re-work the paper
  • Submit to an alternative journal
  • But write for a journal

What happens once your paper has been accepted?

Once your paper is accepted for publication, it will be forwarded to the production team for processing.

  • Copy-edits your paper into the journal style
  • Creates a PDF of proofs to be sent to you for final review
  • Corrects any errors you have identified
  • Sends the final copy to the printer
  • Dispatches the journal to subscribers
  • Provides authors with access to a PDF of their final article.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in APA Format, APA Style, Journal Selection

Journal selection: Choosing to which journal to send your manuscript

Many people leave the decision until they have written the manuscript. That is fine if you are experienced in publishing. You probably have identified two or three potential journals where to send your manuscript. However, if you are new – or even if you are experienced – in publishing, the more certain you are about which journal you are targeting, the easier it is to write the manuscript.

As will become clear, there are numerous factors to consider when choosing a journal. It is unlikely that one journal will have all of the features you are looking for, so you may have to compromise. However, there is one essential feature you should not compromise on – manuscripts must be peer reviewed for publication if they are to be considered research articles.

Once you decide on a journal, obtain and read that journal’s Instructions to Authors. This document describes the format for your article and provides information on how to submit your manuscript. Decide early before the writing begins. That way you can write for the journal’s audience and according to their guidelines.

The following will help you make a short list of potential journals and decide which is the most appropriate and suitable journal for the manuscript you are planning to write:

  • Is the journal peer reviewed?
  • Does the journal currently publish papers on subjects such as yours? If you were looking for papers like your own, in which journals would you look?
  • Which journals have the best reputation for publishing in your field? Ask colleagues which journals they respect. Look at recent articles and judge their importance. Is the Editorial Board composed of leaders in their fields? What is the journal’s impact factor?
  • Which journals are most likely to be cited by others in your field?
  • Is the journal published by a society? Society journals are usually the most prestigious and have the largest circulation. Be wary of new journals (in print or on the internet), especially those not sponsored by a society.
  • Is the journal indexed in the major electronic databases such as Medline, Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents, etc.?
  • Which journals have the kind of expertise that would ensure your paper is given a “fair hearing”?
  • Are there journals whose readership you need/want to influence?
  • How often is the journal published? What is the usual time lag between receiving and publishing papers? Using the “date submitted”, the “date accepted”, and the date of the issue of published articles you can estimate the length of the review process as well as the time from acceptance to publication in print.
  • Is the journal published in English? English has become the language for international scientific communication. Therefore, if you are interested in communicating to the international scientific community, it is essential to publish in English. If you wish to
    communicate to a more localized community, you might choose a journal that permits another language.
  • What is the focus of the journal; is it broad or narrow? Which disciplines are represented? What is the journal’s research orientation; is it basic, theoretical, or applied?
  • Do you like the appearance of published articles – the format, typeface, and style used in citing references? If relevant, does the journal publish short and/or rapid communications?
  • Do the figures published in the journal have the resolution that you need?
  • Is speed an issue? If so, monthly journals have a shorter lag time than quarterly journals.

Once you have decided on a journal, you must obtain a copy of the most recent author guidelines. You can usually obtain a copy of the journal’s Instructions to Authors on their website or in the first issue of a new volume. You must follow these guidelines explicitly or
you might delay the publication of your manuscript.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Editing, Journal Selection

Tips on Writing for Social Science

  • Be clear and direct about your thesis or argument and define your key concepts at the beginning of the paper.
  • Cite empirical evidence to support using APA format (see below for more info). This includes in-text citations and a References section at the end with full details for each reference.
  • Evidence means statistics from a reputable primary source like the Census Bureau, General Social Survey, or Bureau of Justice; quotes from peer-reviewed academic articles and research reports; information from class reading assignments and lectures properly attributed to the original source. (So, don’t cite your teacher for talking about something in lecture that is from one of the readings.)
  • Evidence does not include personal anecdotes, statistics from unreliable sources such a blogs or Wikipedia, or hypothetical examples (although these may be used for explanatory purposes).
  • Do not rely too heavily on long quotes from your sources. Make sure to explain the context of the quotes you do use, and how they relate to the point you are trying to make.
  • Do not write in the first-person or include your opinions unless the assignment specifically requires it. You do not need to take sides on an issue if the assignment is to present multiple perspectives. Again, only choose a side if the assignment calls for it, and be sure to explain your choice according to the evidence, not just your opinion.
  • Avoid exaggerations and claims you cannot support with evidence. Example: “Since the beginning of time, inequality has plagued humankind.” (Is there evidence for that?)
  • Avoid biased and subjective language. Examples: “Racism is pure evil” (subjective); say “humankind” instead of “mankind.”
  • Use subheadings to structure your paper. This is helpful to the reader and also helpful to make sure you’ve addressed all parts of the assignment.
  • The more you read social science articles, the more you will absorb the conventions of writing for social science. Ask your instructor or the library staff to help you locate primary source social science articles in our online databases, such as JSTOR or ProQuest.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in APA Format, Writing

Differences between MLA and APA

MLA (Modern Language Association)

  • Author-page method of citation.
  • Created for scholars in English composition and literature.
  • Author’s full name on first mention.
  • Use of the “right” language for the audience being addressed.
  • Present tense verb in signal phrase vs. past tense.
  • Medium of publication designation (ex. Print, Web, etc.).
  • Many purposes for writing and research.

APA (American Psychological Association)

  • Author-date method of citation.
  • Created for researchers in the social sciences.
  • Authors’ last names only.
  • Objective tone, scientific writing.
  • Economy of expression.
  • Past or present perfect tense verb in signal phrase*.
  • DOI (digital object identifier) or document number.
  • Two purposes for writing and research.

* Present tense is used “to discuss implications of the results and to present conclusions”

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in APA Style, MLA Style, Writing
RSS
editEon tweets

Top 8 tips help you to turn your PhD thesis into an article - Many first-time authors use the research... tmblr.co/ZBlQct2bbXqgK

About 7 years ago from editEon's Twitter via Tumblr

Quality Guarantee

editEon offers 100% on-time delivery guarantee. This ensures that all your editing assignments will be delivered at the date and time stipulated at the time of job confirmation.

Payment Options

RSSFrom Our Blog