Blog Archives

Steps to writing an effective discussion section

The purpose of the Discussion is to state your interpretations and opinions, explain the implications of your findings, and make suggestions for future research. Its main function is to answer the questions posed in the Introduction, explain how the results support the

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Journal article, Medical Writing, Review article, Scientific writing, Writing

New article format aims to prevent ‘sloppiness’ in science

The journal Cortex launched an innovation in scientific publishing called a Registered Report. Unlike conventional publishing models, Registered Reports split the review process into two stages. Initially, experimental methods and proposed analyses are pre-registered and reviewed before data are collected. Then, if peer

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Case report, Journal article, Review article, Scientific editing

Offender in neurodegenerative diseases can benefit normal cells

The propensity of proteins to stick together in large clumps — termed “protein aggregation” — is the culprit behind a variety of conditions including Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s and mad cow diseases. With this notoriety, protein aggregation is considered to be a

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Journal article, Scientific editing, Scientific writing

Bad night’s sleep? The moon might be to blame

A report in Current Biology offers scientific evidence of the moon’s effect on sleep Many people complain about poor sleep around the full moon, and now a report just published in Current Biology, offers some of the first convincing scientific evidence to

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Case report, Journal article

Can the law improve diabetes prevention and control?

New cases of diabetes continue to increase as does the health burden for those with diabetes. Law is a critical tool for health improvement, yet assessments reported in a new study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine indicate that federal,

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Editing, Journal article, Review article, Scientific editing

Shielding Good Science: Upholding Publishing Ethics

If a plagiarist plagiarizes from an author who herself/himself has plagiarized, do we call it a wash and go for a beer? Does this sounds familiar?  Chances are, no. Does this kind of cut-and-paste happen in research publishing today? Sadly, yes.  According to Science (Vol.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Case report, Journal article, Review article, Scientific editing, Scientific writing

Ten tips for reviewing scientific manuscripts and 5 red flags

Ten tips for reviewing 1. Ensure that the subject is within your purview of expertise: Thus, if you are an interventional cardiologist, it would probably be best if you declined an opportunity to review a manuscript involving the pathogenesis of

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Editing, Impact Factor, Journal article, Journal Selection, Review article, Scientific editing, Scientific writing

Ten things you need to know about the publishing process

1. Getting a paper published is a collaboration If there is one point that I’d most like you take away from this talk, it’s that the process of getting a paper published is a collaboration among authors, reviewers and editors.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Impact Factor, Journal article, Journal Selection, Review article, Scientific editing, Scientific writing

8 reasons why journal accepts your article

It’s the responsibility of every editor-in-chief to maintain and develop their journal’s profile and reputation. The editor also has the final responsibility for content, ensuring that it meets the aims and scope of the journal and reflects changes in the

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Case report, Journal article, Journal Selection, Scientific editing, Writing

Eight reasons why journal rejects your article

When a manuscript is submitted to a high-quality scholarly journal, it goes through intense scrutiny  — even before it’s seen by the editor-in-chief and selected for peer review. A journal editor reveals the top reasons so many manuscripts don’t make it

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Impact Factor, Journal article, Journal Selection, Scientific editing, Scientific writing
RSS
editEon tweets

Top 8 tips help you to turn your PhD thesis into an article - Many first-time authors use the research... tmblr.co/ZBlQct2bbXqgK

About 6 years ago from editEon's Twitter via Tumblr

Quality Guarantee

editEon offers 100% on-time delivery guarantee. This ensures that all your editing assignments will be delivered at the date and time stipulated at the time of job confirmation.

Payment Options

RSSFrom Our Blog